Wikipedia is not the Enemy Project Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Wikipedia is not the Enemy Project - Assignment ExampleIts importance to the hostel makes it is worth being entangled in Wikipedia.Writing Entrepreneurship as a topic in Wikipedia is not enough. The author must ensure a proper breakdown into smaller and detailed subtopics. As an author, I would include detailed subtopics like definition and solid ground, importance, definition and qualities of an entrepreneur and types of entrepreneurship. In the listing, I would overly include the potential sources of finance for startups, forecasters of success in entrepreneurship and examples of successful entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship. At the end of the article, I would include a reference list. In the topic, the most potentially controversial parts are the definition and the sources of finance for startups parameters for criterion success because they are not measurable, and every individual can have their opinion. I would gain development on entrepreneurship from business journals, b ooks and newspapers because they provide a lot of information (Wikipedia 1).The entry of entrepreneurship article in Wikipedia is a shorter version compared to what other sources provide. Wikipedia has divided it into numerous subtopics namely definition, background, history, definition and skills of and entrepreneur, psychological makeup, project entrepreneurship, financing, predictors of success, recent developers and referencing with supercharge reading. The entry was last revised on 27, October 2014 at 1307 hours. The experts cited in the article include Joseph Schumpeter, Jean Baptist, pecker Drucker and Frank Knight (Wikipedia 1).The history subtopic in the article is shorter and less informative. The barriers to entrepreneurship that the article provides are outdated with the grey-headed days of 17th and 19th centuries. The 21st century needs more descriptive and informative barriers. The subtopics of background and history have been de-emphasized, and the interested reade r may feel frustrated. A reader might also feel cheated